Etika Peperiksaan dalam Kalangan Pelajar Institusi Pengajian Tinggi
Keywords:
Etika Peperiksaan, Teori Tindakan Terancang, Sikap, Norma Subjektif, KeagamaanAbstract
Etika peperiksaan merupakan satu norma yang menentukan dan membezakan sesuatu tindakan pelajar sama ada baik atau buruk dalam peperiksaan. Objektif kajian ini ialah mengkaji etika peperiksaan dalam kalangan pelajar di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi. Secara spesifik, kajian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan di antara faktor penentu dengan etika peperiksaan. Kajian ini mengetengahkan faktor penentu dari teori tindakan terancang (Theory of Planned Behaviour). Faktor penentu tersebut adalah sikap, norma subjektif dan keagamaan. Bentuk kajian ini adalah kuantitatif dan deskriptif. Kaedah kutipan data adalah menggunakan borang soal selidik dan responden terdiri dari 180 pelajar yang dipilih secara persampelan rawak di dua institusi pengajian tinggi swasta (IPTS) di Selangor. Kajian ini menggunakan analisis korelasi untuk mengkaji hubungan diantara faktor penentu dengan etika peperiksaan. Hasil analisis korelasi mendapati ketiga-tiga faktor iaitu sikap, norma subjektif dan keagamaan mempunyai hubungan positif yang signifikan dengan etika peperiksaan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan semakin tinggi sikap yang baik, norma subjektif dan keagamaan pelajar maka semakin tinggi etika peperiksaan mereka. Pengenalpastian faktor dalaman pelajar ini menunjukkan etika peperiksaan boleh ditingkatkan dengan pendedahan kepentingan etika peperiksaan dan seterusnya mengurangkan masalah pembelajaran seperti plagiarism dan meniru semasa peperiksaan dijalankan. Ini juga membolehkan pengurangan tingkahlaku tidak beretika apabila pelajar bekerja pada masa akan datang.
Examination ethics is a norm that determines and differentiates a student's actions whether good or bad in the examination. The objective of this study is to examine the examination ethics among students in Higher Learning Institutions. Specifically, this study aims to look at the relationship between the determinant factors and examination ethics. This study highlights the determining factors from the Theory of Planned Behaviour. The determining factors are attitudes, subjective norms and religion. The form of this study is quantitative and descriptive. The method of data collection is using a questionnaire form and the respondents consisted of 180 students selected by random sampling at two private institutions of higher learning (IPTS) in Selangor. This study uses correlation analysis to examine the relationship between determinants and examination ethics. The results of correlation analysis found that all three factors, namely attitude, subjective norms and religion have a significant positive relationship with examination ethics. The results show that the higher the good attitude, subjective and religious norms of students, the higher their examination ethics. The identification of these internal factors of students shows that examination ethics can be improved by exposing the importance of examination ethics and in turn reducing learning problems such as plagiarism and imitation during examinations. This also allows for the reduction of unethical behaviour when students work in the future.
Downloads
References
Ajzen, I. (1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. l-63). New York: Academic Press.
Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, 50, 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Retrieved June 27, 2011.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The Influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B.T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173-221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ajzen, I., Joyce, N., Sheikh, S., & Cote, N. G. (2011). Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: The role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 101–117.
Ali Maskur, Endang Tjahjaningsih, Adib Saeroji. (2015). Pengaruh Norma Subjektif Dan Kontrol Perilaku Yang Dipersepsikan Terhadap Niat Pinjam KUR Mikro: Studi Pada Nasabah BRI di Pati.
Alleynee, P. & Philip, K. (2011). Exploring Academic Dishonesty among University Students in Barbados: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9, 323-338. DOI 10.1007/s10805-011-9144-1.
Bloodgood, J.M., Turnley, W.H. & Mudrack, P. (2008). The influence of ethics instruction, religiosity, and intelligence on cheating behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 82 (3), 557-571.
Brown, B.S. & Choong, P. (2003). Acomparison of Academic Dishonesty among Business Students in a public and private Catholic University. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 12 (1), 27-48.
Bruggeman, E. & Hart, K. (1996). “Cheating, lying and moral reasoning by religious and secular high school students”. Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 89 No. 6, p340-344
Buntat, Y. & Mat Nasir, N. S. (2011). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mendorong Kreativiti Di Kalangan Pelajar, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Journal of Educational Psychology and Counseling, 2, 175-208
Burton, J.H., Talpade, S. and Haynes, J. (2011), Religiosity and test-taking ethics among business school students. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 4(18).
Desi Purnamasari. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Kecurangan Akademik pada Mahasiswa. Educational Psychology Journal, 2 (1): 13-21.
Ding, L., Velicer, W.F., & Harlow, L.L. (1995). Effects of Estimation Methods, Number of Indicators Per Factor, and Improper Solutions on SEM Fit Indices. Structural Equation Modeling 2, 119–4.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, And Behaviour: An Introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fisher, J., Kim, H., Lee, S. & Sacks, S. (1998), Stability of religious orientation and academic dishonesty. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 7 (1), 55-66.
Gbadamosi, G. (2004). Academic Ethics: What has Morality, Culture and Administration got to do with its Measurement? Management Decision. 42, 1145-1161.
Graham, M.A., Monday, J., O’Brien, K. & Steffen, S. (1994), “Cheating at small colleges: an examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviours”, Journal of College Student Development, 35 (4), pp. 255-260.
Grimes, P. W. & Rezek, J. P. (2005). “The determinants of cheating by high school economics students: a comparative study of academic dishonesty in the transitional economies”, International Review of Economics Education, 4(2), 23-45.
Guttman, J. (1984), “Cognitive morality and cheating behavior in religious and secular school children”, Journal of Educational Research, 77(4), 249-254.
Hussein, N., Rahman, N. A. A., Rusdi, S. D., Omar, M. K., & Aziz, Z. Z. A. (2018). Factors that Influence Self-Perceived Academic Cheating: An Empirical Evidence of Business Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(11), 758–767.
Imran, A. M., & Nordin, M. S. (2013). Predicting the Underlying Factors of Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduates in Public Universities: A Path Analysis Approach. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11(2), 103–120.
Ismail, S. & Yussof, S. H., (2016). Accounting Research Journal Cheating behavior among accounting students: some Malaysian evidence. Accounting Research Journal, 29(1): 20–33.
Johnson, B.R., Larson, D.B., Jang, S.J. Andli, S.D. (2000). “Who Escapes the Crime Of inner Cities: Church Attendance and Religious Salience Among Disadvantaged Youth”, Justice Quarterly, 17(2), p. 701-715.
Khan, Khalid, Hasnain, Ullah, Ali. (2019). The Impact of Religiosity and Spirituality on Academic Dishonesty of Students in Pakistan. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 8(3), 381-398.
Krejcie, Robert, V., Morgan, & Daryle, W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Maisarah Mohamed Saat, Hapriza Ashari, Ungku Norulkamar Ungku Ahmad. (2009). Persepsi Pelajar Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Terhadap Etika Peperiksaan: Satu Tinjauan Awal.
Mattis, J. S. and Watson, C.R. (2008), Religiosity and spirituality”, in Tynes, B. M., Neville, H. A. and Utsey, S.O. (Eds), Handbook of African American Psychology, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, p. 91-102.
McDaniel, S.W. & Burnett, J.J. (1990). Consumer Religiosity and Retail Store Evaluative Criteria. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 8 (2), 101-112.
Mei Wah. M. Williams & Matthew Neils Willliams. (2012). Academic Dishonesty, Self Control and General Criminality: Prospective and Retrospective Study of Academic Dishonesty in a New Zealand University. Ethic and Behaviour, 22(2), 89 -112.
Mohd Janib Johari. (1994). Moral “Etika Profesional”, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Unit Penerbitan Akademik.
Mustapha, R. & Nik Ali, N. A., (2017). An Empirical Survey of an Academic Dishonesty at A Major Public Universities In Recent Years: The Malaysian Evidence, 5(3), 43-49.
Noor-Raudhiah, Abu-Bakar, Farah, Shahwahid, Siti-Hawa, Radin-Eksan (2018). Theory of Planned Behaviour and Halal Compliance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 8(5), May 2018, E-ISSN: 2222 6990.
Nur Yeliz Gülcan. (2015). Discussing The Importance of Teaching Ethics in Education. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2622 – 2625.
Nurhasyimah S. (2012). Penilaian Etika Dan Integriti Dalam Peperiksaan Di Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah. UTM.
Nyoman Ari Surya Dharmawan. (2018). Etika, Agama, dan Cinta Sebagai Modal Dasar Akuntan Dalam Memberantas Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi 3(1),Hal:17-32.
Olaewe, O.O. (2003) Test and Measurement in Education. An Illustrative Approach. Iwo: Agboola Publishing Ltd.
Olorunfemi, Olabisi & Florence, Abiola. (2014). Psychosocial Factors as Determinant of Examination Malpractice among Secondary School Students in Ondo State. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies 8(3), 1258-1264.
Passow, Honor J., Mayhew J., Finelli, Cynthia J., Trevor S., Carpenter & Donald D. (2006). Factor Influencing Engineering Student’s Decisions to Cheat by Type of Assement,Research in Higher Education, 47(6), pp 643-684.
Pruckner, Gerald J. & Sausgruber, Rupert (2008). Honesty on the Streets - A Natural Field Experiment on Newspaper Purchasing (October 2, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1277208 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1277208
Ramlan Mustapha, Zaharah Hussin dan Saedah Siraj (2017). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Ketidakjujuran Akademik Dalam Kalangan Mahasiswa: Aplikasi Teknik Fuzzy Delphi. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 5(2)
Randolph-Seng, B. and Nielsen, M.E. (2007), Honesty: one effect of primed religious representations, International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(4), 303-315.
Rettinger, D.A. & Jordan, A.E. (2005), The Relations Among Religion, Motivation, And College Cheating: A Natural Experiment, Ethics and Behaviour, 2(2) pp. 107 129.
Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2013) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. 6th Edition, Wiley, New York.
Shahidan, Shafie & Ling,Ying-Leh (2017) Pembentukan Sahsiah Berkualiti melalui Penghayatan Kurikulum Pengajian Islam: Satu Kajian Korelasi di Politeknik. National Conference on Thinking Culture (ICTC) 2017 01-03 November 2017.
Suzalie Mohamad. 2003. Memahami Isu-Isu Pendidikan Islam di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: IKIM.
Thomas, H. Stone, Jennifer, L. Kisamore, I.M., & Jawahar. (2007). Predicting Academic Dishonesty. ASAC, Ottawa, Ontario,40-56.
Whitley, B.E., Jr. (1998). Factors Associated with Cheating Among College Students: A Review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235-274.
Wynd, W. R and Mager, J. (1989). The business and society course: does it change student attitudus?, Journal of Business Ethics, 8(6) pp. 487-91
Zaini, Ujang (2010). Berpaksi Inovasi Mengangkasa Universiti Menjana Nilai Tinggi. Johor Bahru: Penerbit UTM Press.
Zakariya, Y. F. & Bamidele, E.F. (2015). Investigation into The Causes of Poor Academic Performance In Mathematics Among Nigerian Undergraduate Students. World Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 1(1) pp.1-5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
